Prepare for the Software Quality Assurance Exam. Tackle multiple-choice questions with detailed explanations. Enhance your understanding and boost your confidence for your exam!

Each practice test/flash card set has 50 randomly selected questions from a bank of over 500. You'll get a new set of questions each time!

Practice this question and more.


Which of the following best describes Peer Ratings in software testing?

  1. Follows undisciplined process of testing and finding errors

  2. Selects a programmer to serve as the administrator of a process

  3. Evaluates anonymous programs for their overall quality, maintainability, and so on

  4. Runs counter to testing principle two, which states that people are generally ineffective in testing their own programs

The correct answer is: Evaluates anonymous programs for their overall quality, maintainability, and so on

The concept of Peer Ratings in software testing is best described by the evaluation of anonymous programs for their overall quality, maintainability, and other relevant attributes. This approach allows peers, who may have different perspectives and expertise, to assess the work without bias, fostering an environment of constructive feedback. When colleagues review each other's code or software products, they provide insights based on their understanding and experience, which can lead to improved quality and adherence to best practices. This system not only enhances the maintainability and effectiveness of the software but also encourages collaboration and knowledge sharing among team members. The emphasis on anonymity in this process often leads to more honest and objective feedback, as evaluators may feel more comfortable highlighting issues without the constraints of personal relationships or hierarchy influencing their opinions. This ultimately contributes to a more reliable assessment of the program’s overall quality. In contrast to this, the other options do not accurately reflect the nature and intent of Peer Ratings. While some may mention a lack of structure or discipline, the essence of Peer Ratings is rooted in systematic evaluation rather than an undisciplined approach. Similarly, the roles of an administrator or the counteraction to testing principles do not capture the collaborative and evaluative spirit that defines Peer Ratings within the software testing environment.