Ace the 2026 Software Quality Assurance Challenge – Elevate Your Testing Skills!

Inspections and walkthroughs are indeed considered human testing methods, but they are not strictly code-oriented methods. They are primarily focused on reviewing software artifacts, including requirements documents, design specifications, and code itself, to identify defects, improve quality, and ensure that the product meets the specified standards.

In inspections, a formal review process is applied, often with a defined set of roles for participants, enabling systematic identification of defects. Walkthroughs, on the other hand, are typically less formal, allowing the author of the document or code to present it to a group for feedback. While code is often a focal point in these activities, the broader objective is to enhance overall software quality through collaborative evaluation.

This nuanced understanding clarifies that while the statement may seem true at first glance—because inspections and walkthroughs do involve examining code—they encompass a wider scope of assessment beyond just coding aspects. Therefore, the statement is not wholly accurate, suggesting that the answer aligns more with the "False" perspective, reflecting a misrepresentation of the role of these methods in the software testing process.